<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Curious Little Table</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/20/a-curious-little-table/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/01/20/a-curious-little-table/</link>
	<description>So many projects, so little time...  Welcome to Woodworking A-D-D.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:16:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/01/20/a-curious-little-table/comment-page-1/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/?p=399#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>Jeremy, I wish I could have tried out that table to test your concerns and I can see them as being valid.  Before I attempt to build this piece I want to go back to the museum and make some more sketches and take better pictures so I can try to reproduce it.  I&#039;ll pay particular attention to the orientation of the top to the legs as well as the span of the legs in relation to the overhang of the table.  I think these two attributes would be the deciding factor in just how stable it will be.  Great point to remember that beauty and form is one thing, but if I want to use the table I need to pay some attention to function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, I wish I could have tried out that table to test your concerns and I can see them as being valid.  Before I attempt to build this piece I want to go back to the museum and make some more sketches and take better pictures so I can try to reproduce it.  I&#8217;ll pay particular attention to the orientation of the top to the legs as well as the span of the legs in relation to the overhang of the table.  I think these two attributes would be the deciding factor in just how stable it will be.  Great point to remember that beauty and form is one thing, but if I want to use the table I need to pay some attention to function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Kriewaldt</title>
		<link>http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/2010/01/20/a-curious-little-table/comment-page-1/#comment-4138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Kriewaldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersfinewoodworking.com/blog/?p=399#comment-4138</guid>
		<description>I truly is a lovely piece and once that is an inspiration to all of us.  I can see it made from some Australian Red Cedar (http://australiancedar.com).

I wonder about the stability of a square top on a triangular base.  My instinct (no more) is that a circular table top will minimise the likelihood of the table tipping if a force is placed on a remote edge (compare a weight put on a corner of the square table as opposed to the same weight on the  circumference of the circular table).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I truly is a lovely piece and once that is an inspiration to all of us.  I can see it made from some Australian Red Cedar (<a href="http://australiancedar.com" rel="nofollow">http://australiancedar.com</a>).</p>
<p>I wonder about the stability of a square top on a triangular base.  My instinct (no more) is that a circular table top will minimise the likelihood of the table tipping if a force is placed on a remote edge (compare a weight put on a corner of the square table as opposed to the same weight on the  circumference of the circular table).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.325 seconds -->
